Monthly Archives: August 2025

August 2025 Newsletter

By | Uncategorized | No Comments

Unlocking Savings: Your Guide to Government Concession Cards

Government concession cards, including the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card, Pensioner Concession Card, Health Care Card and state-based Seniors Cards provide significant savings. These cards help you reduce costs on healthcare, prescriptions, and daily expenses, making life more affordable.

Federal Government Concession Cards

These cards offer lower prescription costs of $7.70 compared to the general rate of $31.60. Also, once you reach the Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme (PBS) Safety Net of $277.20 annually, your PBS medications are free.

The Commonwealth Seniors Health Card (CSHC) is for self-funded retirees aged 67 or older not receiving a Centrelink pension. Your income must be below $99,025 (singles) or $158,440 (couples) indexed annually. With no asset test, it’s ideal for retirees with retirement savings.

The Pensioner Concession Card (PCC) is automatically issued to those on the Age Pension, Disability Support Pension, or Carer Payment. It lasts two years, and is renewed around your birthday. If your social security pension stops permanently due to high income or assets, you must stop using it.

The Health Care Card (HCC), including the Low-Income Health Care Card, is for those on Centrelink payments like JobSeeker, or meeting low-income criteria. Many doctors bulk bill HCC and PCC holders, further cutting healthcare costs.

Extra Benefits of Your Federal Concession Cards

Many states offer concession card holders discounts on utilities such as water, electricity and gas. To find out what concessions are available to you, check out the link to your relevant State Government.

 

State Webpage
New South Wales https://www.service.nsw.gov.au/campaign/savings-finder
Victoria https://services.dffh.vic.gov.au/concessions-and-benefits
Queensland https://www.concessionsfinder.services.qld.gov.au/
Western Australia https://concessions.communities.wa.gov.au/
South Australia https://www.sa.gov.au/topics/care-and-support/concessions/concession-finder
Tasmania https://www.concessions.tas.gov.au/

State-Based Seniors Cards

Alongside federal concession cards, state-based Seniors Cards offer additional discounts. These cards unlock savings on public transport, dining, entertainment and local services, helping you enjoy a more affordable and active lifestyle. From discounted public transport fares with Victoria’s Seniors myki, Queensland’s go card or NSW’s Gold Opal card to special offers at participating businesses, Seniors Cards make everyday experiences more accessible.

Who is eligible

State-based seniors’ cards are generally available for residents over 60 who are no longer working full time. For example, in New South Wales, those 60 or older working 20 hours or less weekly qualify for a Seniors Card, while those working more hours can apply for a Senior Savers Card.

The Victorian Seniors Card is available for Victorians aged 60 or older, working less than 35 hours per week.

In Queensland, you qualify for a Seniors Card or Seniors Card+go if you’re 65 or older and work less than 35 hours per week (averaged over 12 months), or if you’re 60–64, work under 35 hours weekly and hold a PCC, HCC, or eligible Department of Veteran Affairs card. A Queensland Seniors Business Discount Card is available for those aged 60 or older.

Take Advantage of Your Concession Cards

Federal and state-based concession cards help you save where it matters most. Whether it’s lower-cost medications, bulk-billed doctor visits, discounted transport or savings on local services, these cards support your lifestyle and budget. Speak to us about applying for a concession card if you think you may be eligible.

Some CGT consequences of divorce and relationship breakdown 

If you are getting divorced or separated from your spouse, this may involve the transfer of real estate or other assets as part of the settlement of things.  Technically, that transfer will trigger capital gains tax (CGT) because there will be a change in ownership of the property.

However, in this case the CGT rules will provide roll-over relief so that there will be no CGT to the person who transfers the property (the transferor) to the other party.  And that other party will “step into the shoes” of the transferor – so that they will be deemed to have acquired the property at the same time and for the same cost as the transferor.

But this roll-over rule is subject to a number of important conditions and provisos.

Firstly, the transfer of the property must take place by way of a relevant court order or a court-sanctioned agreement – or even a pre-nuptial agreement or the like. But the rollover does not apply to transfers under any private arrangement.

Secondly, the transfer can only be made to the former spouse or partner – it can’t be made to their family company or family trust; nor to their estate if they die in the meantime (subject to an apparent exception if the property is transferred to a child maintenance trust).

Thirdly, if an investment property is transferred to a spouse and it becomes their home, then on its sale by that spouse there is a partial CGT liability to take into account the fact that it wasn’t always a CGT-exempt home. And this rule also applies in reverse.

Fourthly, if an asset (eg, shares or real estate owned by the company) is transferred out of a family company to a spouse, then there must be a corresponding reduction in the value of the shares held in the company to reflect the market value of that property transferred.

Fifthly, the roll-over is available to the divorce or separation of any type of spouse, including de facto and same sex spouses – provided the divorce or separation is “bona-fide”! And note that the Commissioner has in the past successfully challenged the bona-fides of a divorce (albeit, that was done in connection with a taxpayer trying to move assets out of reach of his creditors).

Now, such matters require careful consideration to take into account the particular circumstances of both parties. For example, the transfer of an investment property which will then be used as a home by the other spouse will require negotiation between the parties for adjustment to the settlement amounts to reflect the CGT liability that that spouse will be responsible for in the future.

And this can be difficult – even if the separating parties are actually talking to each other!

And where, say, one of the parties owns an asset on which they will make a capital loss, they can perhaps agree to transfer that property to the other party to realise the loss – but only if they transfer it under a private agreement independent of any court-approved transfer, etc.

In summary, there are lots of important tax issues associated with transferring assets between former spouses under a divorce or a relationship breakdown that require good advice.

So come and speak to us if you find yourself in this situation.

The great wealth transfer: Are you ready? 

Over the next few decades, Australia is expected to witness one of the biggest intergenerational wealth transfers in history with between $3.5 trillion and $5 trillion changing hands as baby boomers pass on their wealth to children and grandchildren.

If you’re expecting to inherit from your parents or grandparents, or you’re thinking about the legacy you’ll leave to your loved ones, it’s important to understand the tax traps and planning strategies that come with this enormous transfer of wealth. While there’s no inheritance tax in Australia, there are other hidden tax pitfalls that can reduce the value of what’s passed down.

The tax traps you should know

Capital gains tax (CGT)

Receiving cash doesn’t attract tax but inheriting property, shares or other investments can trigger capital gains tax (CGT), depending on how and when those assets are sold. For example, if you inherit a home and it’s sold within two years of the deceased’s passing, the sale may be exempt from CGT – provided the home was the person’s main residence.

If you keep the property for longer or it was being used to produce income, CGT could apply down the track when you sell.

Superannuation

Super is another area full of complexity. When someone inherits super, whether or not they pay tax on it depends on a few things – like who they are and how the money is paid.

If the person receiving the super is a “tax dependent” – for example, a spouse or a child under 18 – they usually won’t have to pay any tax if the super is paid as a lump sum.

However, if the person inheriting the super death benefit isn’t a tax dependent (such as an adult child), your super fund will withhold tax before paying the money out. This can range from 17% to 32% (including Medicare levy), depending on the type of contributions that were made to your account (eg, concessional or non-concessional contributions).

Getting advice about how super is structured and who your beneficiaries are can make a big difference in how much tax is paid.

Gifting assets before death

Some people choose to give assets like property or shares to their children while they’re still alive – either to help them out financially or to reduce the size of their estate. While this can be a thoughtful move, it can also lead to an unexpected tax bill.

That’s because giving away certain assets (like an investment property or shares) is treated like selling them, which means CGT may apply. The tax is worked out based on the difference between what the asset is worth now and what you originally paid for it.

However, if the person giving the gift has made a loss on other investments in the past, they may be able to use those losses to cancel out some or all of the gain, reducing or even eliminating the tax they have to pay.

This is why it’s important to get advice before making any big gifts – so you know exactly what the tax consequences might be.

 

Trusts and family structures

Using a family trust or testamentary trust (a trust set up under a will) can offer flexibility and tax savings. These structures allow more control over who receives income and when – which can help manage tax across the family group and avoid disputes. But they need to be set up correctly and in line with your wishes.

Tips to protect your family’s wealth

  1. Get your will and estate plan in order – having a legally binding will is the foundation of a good wealth transfer plan. It’s also wise to appoint a power of attorney and an executor who understands your wishes and has the emotional and practical ability to carry them out.
  2. Talk openly with your family – the emotional side of inheritance is just as important as the financial side. Discuss your intentions early to avoid surprises and prevent family conflict down the line.
  3. Understand the tax implications – don’t assume everything passes tax-free. Ask questions about CGT, super and gifting – especially if you’re likely to inherit property, shares or other non-cash assets.
  4. Review your super nominations – make sure your beneficiaries are up to date and that you’ve completed the right type of nomination form (binding vs non-binding). This helps ensure your super goes where you want it to, without unnecessary tax or delay.
  5. Seek professional help – the rules are complex, and mistakes can be costly. Getting the right advice from a professional who understands estate planning and tax can help you make smarter decisions and keep more money within your family unit.

Need help planning or receiving an inheritance?

Whether you’re planning your legacy or expecting to receive one, we can help you navigate the rules, reduce the tax and protect what matters most.

Self-managed super funds: A suitable path to retirement control? 

Self-Managed Super Funds (SMSFs) are a key part of Australia’s superannuation system, offering control over retirement savings. As of March 2025, about 650,000 SMSFs manage $1 trillion in assets – a quarter of the $4.1 trillion superannuation pool. Let’s take a quick look at who uses SMSFs, why they’re chosen, costs and setup essentials for those considering this option.

Who uses SMSFs?

SMSFs attract people who want to manage their retirement funds. As of March 2025, there are around 1.2 million SMSF members. About 68% of funds have two members (often couples), 25% have one member, and 7% have three to six members. Most members (85%) are over 45, with the average member holding over $800,000 in assets.

Why choose an SMSF?

The main appeal of an SMSF is control. Unlike industry or retail funds, SMSF members act as trustees, tailoring their investment strategies. This allows investments in assets like real estate, cryptocurrencies, or unlisted assets, often unavailable elsewhere.

SMSFs also offer transparency and tax benefits. For example, trustees can time when they sell assets and realise profits. SMSFs also provide flexibility in estate planning with bespoke binding death benefit nominations not ordinarily offered by large super funds.

Setting up and ongoing administration

Creating an SMSF involves some paperwork but is manageable with clear steps. Working with an SMSF professional can make the process smoother and ensure everything is set up correctly.

Here’s how to get started:

  • Choose Your Trustee Structure: Opt for individual trustees (up to six, with all members as trustees) or a corporate trustee (members as company directors, each needing a Director Identification Number from the Australian Business Registry Service). For single-member funds, individual trustees require a second trustee, and members can’t be employees of each other unless related.
  • Verify Trustee Eligibility: Ensure no trustee is bankrupt or has a dishonesty conviction.
  • Create a Trust Deed: Work with a professional to draft a trust deed outlining your fund’s rules, ensuring compliance with superannuation laws.
  • Establish an Australian Fund: Set up the SMSF in Australia, with management and assets based locally, to meet Australian super fund requirements.
  • Register with the ATO: Within 60 days, apply for an Australian Business Number (ABN) and Tax File Number (TFN) through the Australian Taxation Office (ATO).
  • Open a Bank Account: Set up a dedicated SMSF bank account to manage contributions and investments, kept separate from personal finances.
  • Set Up SuperStream and Investment Strategy: Obtain an Electronic Service Address (ESA) for SuperStream compliance and develop an investment strategy tailored to your retirement goals.
  • SMSFs require ongoing management which includes maintaining records, filing annual tax returns and conducting audits. An SMSF professional can help you stay compliant and make the most of your fund.

Costs involved

SMSFs can involve significant administrative work and be time-consuming to manage. Professional advice and administration can increase expenses but reduce workload. Keep in mind that insurance premiums, such as life or disability cover, are typically higher in SMSFs as they do not benefit from bulk discount arrangements. Trustees can lower costs by handling some administration, requiring time and expertise.

Is an SMSF right for you?

SMSFs offer control and flexibility, ideal for those with financial literacy, time, and larger balances, as lower balances may not justify the associated costs. However, they also come with responsibilities, including the risk of potential investment losses and the need to meet compliance obligations. If you’re considering an SMSF and want to understand more about how they work, feel free to give us a call – we can help you explore whether it might be a suitable structure for your needs.

What to expect from tax reform? Given past history, not very much, unfortunately

The Treasurer, Jim Chalmers, has convened a Productivity Roundtable for late August, with three main areas of focus – productivity, economic resilience and budget sustainability. He has sought ideas and proposals from stakeholders, which should be:

  • in the national interest;
  • fiscally responsible – ie, revenue positive or at least revenue neutral; and
  • specific and practical.

Increasing Australia’s productivity, which is the economic output produced by a given set of inputs, is a key factor in improving living standards. Australia’s productivity performance has been lagging behind comparable economies for some years now.

The Treasurer has specifically called for tax reform ideas that are likely to boost our productivity. What sort of tax policy changes are likely to fit the bill, and what are the chances of them being adopted?

One of the many problems in tackling tax reform is that most people’s idea of tax reform is for somebody else to pay more tax. And not everybody even agrees that we should raise more tax, saying we should curb our spending instead. Others think it should be a bit of both.

This turns tax reform into a political exercise and in spite of some people urging the government to use its strong Parliamentary majority to make brave decisions about tax, the government didn’t run on a platform of major tax reform at the recent election and can’t claim to have a mandate for tax reform.

You don’t need to have a long memory to recall the unexpected federal election loss suffered by the ALP in 2019. Many political pundits attributed that loss to some unpopular tax policies in Labor’s platform – restricting negative gearing, the capital gains tax discount and refundable franking credits. A highly effective scare campaign run by opponents of those policies was partly blamed for the election outcome.

Labor would be unlikely to serve up those specific policies again unless there was strong community and bi-partisan support for them, which seems unlikely. Instead, we are likely to see further scare campaigns from those with a vested interest in maintaining our existing policy settings.

Another candidate for major tax reform is already looking like being a non-starter.

Some are urging the government to consider reducing direct taxes such as personal and company income tax and increasing the GST (with appropriate compensation for low income families). All taxes have a negative impact on economic activity. Taxing something means there will be less of it, but the “dead-weight” cost of imposing a consumption tax is less than it is for income tax, resulting in increased economic activity, which boosts the tax base while improving living standards.

While the Treasurer has signaled he is not attracted to increasing the GST’s base or rate, he wants to avoid ruling anything in or out at this early stage. The Prime Minister has no such qualms and has made it clear in recent comments that the GST will not be increased on his watch. The rule in/rule out game is off to an early start.

Major tax reform has always been challenging because it invariably involves winners and losers. The losers tend to be well represented and loud, while the winners tend to be more diffused and quieter. All these things are built up by the media, who love nothing better than public policy controversy around tax.

And the final obstacle to comprehensive tax reform is that, in the context of deficits stretching as far as the eye can see, there is no spare money with which to compensate the losers.

Whether the Roundtable can agree on other tax policy changes that can be fairly labeled as reform remains to be seen. We wish the Treasurer well in his endeavours, but we won’t be expecting any miracles.

Tax deductibility of clothing 

The tax deductibility of clothing is a topic that often confuses taxpayers, as the rules are specific and nuanced.

However, the ATO sets clear guidelines on when clothing expenses can be claimed as tax deductions, and understanding these rules is essential for individuals and businesses seeking to maximise their tax benefits while remaining compliant.

As a broad principle, the ATO allows deductions for expenses that are directly related to earning assessable income, but excludes categories of expenditure which are regarded as being of a private or domestic nature – which clothing prima-facie falls into.

Generally, the ATO takes the view that clothing expenses are deductible if the clothing is:

  • Occupation-specific: The clothing must be uniquely associated with a particular profession or occupation and not suitable for everyday wear.
  • Protective: The clothing must provide a necessary level of protection against workplace hazards.
  • Compulsory: The clothing must be a compulsory uniform with a logo or design that identifies the wearer as an employee of a specific organisation.
  • Registered with the ATO’s Industry Clothing Register: Non-compulsory uniforms must be included on this register to qualify for deductions.

Conversely, conventional clothing (eg, business suits, or general workwear) is typically not deductible, even if required by an employer, unless it meets one of the above criteria.

It is also important to note that taxpayers can also claim expenses for laundering, dry cleaning, or repairing work-related clothing where the cost of purchasing is deductible. The ATO provides a standard rate of $1 per load for work-related clothing washed separately or 50 cents per load if mixed with other laundry. Alternatively, taxpayers can claim actual expenses if they keep receipts and can substantiate the costs.

And of course, to claim clothing deductions, taxpayers must maintain proper records, such as receipts or invoices for purchases and evidence of laundry expenses. Additionally, taxpayers must demonstrate that the clothing is used primarily for work purposes. For example, if protective clothing is also worn outside of work, only the work-related portion of the expense may be deductible.

By way of example, consider a construction worker who purchases steel-capped boots for $150. These boots are deductible as protective clothing, and the worker can also claim laundry costs for cleaning them. Conversely, a corporate employee who buys a $500 suit for client meetings cannot claim a deduction, as the suit is conventional clothing. A flight attendant required to wear a branded uniform with the airline’s logo can claim the cost of the uniform and its maintenance, as it is a compulsory uniform.

The tax deductibility of clothing in Australia is governed by strict ATO guidelines, focusing on occupation-specific clothing, protective gear, and compulsory or registered non-compulsory uniforms. Taxpayers must ensure that their claims meet these criteria and are supported by proper documentation.

So, always consult with us first for personalised advice to ensure compliance with current regulations.

July 2025 Newsletter

By | Uncategorized | No Comments

Working from home and occupancy costs 

A recent Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) decision on working from home costs during the 2020-21 COVID lockdowns (Hall’s case) may widen the scope for claiming additional deductions for occupancy costs such as rent, mortgage interest, home insurances and rates, but only in specific circumstances. This is on top of the hourly rate most people claim to cover additional energy, phone and internet costs.

Like many others, Mr Hall was forced to work from home in order to do his work, which involved the production of an on-line radio sports program for the ABC in Melbourne. The combination of government-imposed restrictions and the ABC’s own rules meant that during the height of the COVID lockdowns in 2020-21, the spare bedroom in a rented apartment which he used exclusively or nearly exclusively to carry out his role for the ABC was his only place of business.

Importantly, Mr Hall was not running a business from his home. He was an employee working remotely, as over a third of Australian employees still do to some extent these days. While Tribunal decisions are not legally binding, and Hall’s case only applies to the 2020-21 income year at the height of the COVID lockdowns, the decision seems well-reasoned and could arguably be applied more broadly.

While the lockdowns are thankfully well behind us now, the principle governing the Tribunal’s decision is that a proportion of a taxpayer’s rent (or mortgage interest) may be deductible where the employer does not provide a work space and the taxpayer has no alternative but to work from home. This can and does happen even today, well after the masks have been put away.

Who might qualify?

An important factor in the Hall case was that there was no element of choice involved. No workplace was legally available to Mr Hall at the ABC Studios and he had no alternative but to use his spare bedroom to produce his radio sports program. Where an employee works under flexible arrangements by choice (eg, three days from home; two days in the office) the reasoning in Hall’s case is not so easily applied since it would be open to the employee to attend the office every day. You could still make a claim, but it could be difficult to sustain.

On the other hand, where there is no longer an office to attend because the employer has chosen to cut back on rental costs, the only option for the employee is to work from home. In other situations employees might interact exclusively online with externals and other parts of the business because they don’t live in the same State as their employer’s office. Again, such an employee has no place to work from other than their home.

To be eligible for a proportional deduction for occupancy costs, the employee would need to work out of a designated area such as a spare room and use that area exclusively or nearly exclusively as their home office. Just setting up the laptop on the dining room table when the dining room is regularly used for other purposes isn’t enough.

Capital gains tax

Employees who might qualify for a proportional deduction for occupancy costs that includes mortgage interest will need to consider the potential impact on the capital gains tax (CGT) exemption on their main residence before deciding to pursue a claim. The main residence CGT exemption is reduced by the same proportion as the claim for occupancy costs, and a valuation is required at the time the home is first used partly for income-producing purposes.

So a home owner without a mortgage or with only a small mortgage may decide that claiming a proportion of occupancy costs isn’t worth compromising their main residence CGT exemption. We can help you weigh up the options. An employee who rents, as Mr Hall did, would have no such concerns.

The Commissioner is unlikely to allow occupancy claims

At the time of writing, the ATO has not responded in any way to the Tribunal’s decision in Hall. However, it is unlikely the ATO will welcome a flood of claims for a proportion of occupancy costs and will most probably disallow any claims that are identified.

In order to avoid the risk of penalties and interest, the best course would be to just claim the normal hourly rate (or actual cost method) to cover additional running costs when lodging your return. Then, after the notice of assessment has been received, lodge an objection claiming the occupancy costs. That way your rights are protected and you are not exposed to penalties or interest.

There may also be scope to revisit earlier assessments if you were locked down for a period and worked from home using a designated area exclusively or nearly exclusively for that purpose. In the case of earlier assessments it may be necessary to ask the Commissioner for extra time in which to lodge an objection.

We are here to help you

We should have a discussion about this issue if:

  • your employer requires you to regularly work from home;
  • no office space is available for you in which to perform your duties;
  • you work from home using a designated space such as a spare room which is used exclusively or nearly exclusively for that purpose; and
  • you rent your home or if you are a home owner and you have a substantial mortgage.

Super guarantee is increasing to 12% 

From 1 July 2025, your superannuation guarantee (SG) rate is increasing to 12%. That means more money going into your super from your employer, helping you build a better nest egg for retirement.

But what happens if you earn some of your wages before 30 June but get paid after 1 July? Will the higher super rate apply to that pay too? Let’s break it down.

It’s all about when you get paid

The key rule here is that the SG rate is based on when you’re paid, not when you earned the money.

So even if you did the work in June, if your pay day is on or after 1 July 2025, your employer has to pay 12% super on those wages.

If you get paid before 1 July 2025, then the old rate of 11.5% applies – if the work was done in July. It all comes down to the date the money hits your bank account.

A quick example

Let’s say George works for XYZ Pty Ltd.

  • If George works in June (or even across June and July), but gets paid in July, his employer must pay 12% super on the whole amount.
  • If George works in July, but for some reason gets paid in advance in June, only 11.5% super applies.

Your employer will then need to send that super contribution to your fund by the usual deadlines – generally within 28 days after the end of the quarter.

The final step in a long journey

The increase in the SG rate to 12% is the last step in a plan that’s been rolling out over the past few years. Here’s how the SG rate has been increasing:

 

Period SG rate (%)
1 July 2020 – 30 June 2021 9.5
1 July 2021 – 30 June 2022 10
1 July 2022 – 30 June 2023 10.5
1 July 2023 – 30 June 2024 11
1 July 2024 – 30 June 2025 11.5
1 July 2025 onwards 12

 

This is great news for workers, because more super means more savings for retirement, and that can make a big difference later on.

What counts for super?

Super is generally paid on what’s called your ordinary time earnings (OTE). That’s the amount you’re paid for your regular working hours, plus things like commissions, allowances, and shift loadings.

Super usually isn’t paid on things like overtime, reimbursements, and some other specific payments.

Need help?

If you’re unsure whether your super is being calculated correctly, don’t hesitate to ask for help. Your super is your money for the future, so it’s worth making sure you’re getting everything you’re entitled to.

For employers, if you’re uncertain about how the new super rate applies to your team, or need clarity on which payments count for super, don’t leave it to chance. Getting it right helps you avoid costly mistakes and penalties. We’re here to help both employees and employers understand their super obligations and entitlements, so you can have confidence that everything’s on tra

New super facts and figures from 1 July 2025 

If you’ve been keeping an eye on your super, you might be wondering whether the contribution limits are increasing this year. The answer is – not yet.

Two key caps that determine how much you can put into super each year will stay the same from 1 July 2025.

Concessional contributions

These are contributions made before tax – like employer contributions, salary sacrifice, or personal contributions that you claim as a tax deduction. They’re taxed at 15% when they go into your super fund (unless you’re a high-income earner, in which case extra tax may apply).

And here’s a bonus – if you haven’t used your full concessional caps in recent years and your total super balance is under $500,000 as at 30 June 2025, you may be able to use the catch-up (carry-forward) rule to contribute more.

Non-concessional contributions

These are contributions made from your after-tax money. You don’t get a tax deduction for these contributions, but they’re a great way to boost your super savings over time.

Plus, if you’re under 75, you might be able to use the bring-forward rule to contribute up to $360,000 in one go by using three years’ worth of caps. Just remember – eligibility rules apply, like your total super balance and whether you’ve used this rule before.

For now, these caps are staying at $30,000 for concessional contributions and $120,000 for non-concessional contributions per financial year. If you were hoping to contribute even more, you’ll need to wait for a future increase.

So what is changing? The transfer balance cap

Starting 1 July 2025, the limit on how much super you can move into a tax-free retirement pension account will go up from $1.9 million to $2 million. This limit is called the transfer balance cap. This change means you can transfer more of your super into a tax-free pension when you retire.

The money you withdraw from your super pension (also called an account-based pension) is not taxed if you are 60 or over and the pension’s investment earnings are not taxed either. This can make a big difference to your savings in retirement.

If you haven’t started a pension before, the new cap of $2 million applies to you in full. However, if you’ve already started one, your personal cap may be somewhere between $1.6 million and $2 million, depending on your past pension history.

In the end, this increase is great news for anyone thinking about retirement, giving you more room to grow your super in a tax-free environment.

Why does this matter?

Even though the contribution caps aren’t going up, the increase to the transfer balance cap is a good reminder to check in on your super strategy, especially if retirement is on the horizon.

If you’re still working, now’s a great time to make sure you’re making the most of the current concessional and non-concessional contribution limits to build your super while you can.

And if you’re approaching retirement, consider how the higher transfer balance cap could open up more tax-free opportunities for your pension savings. It might be worth thinking about whether you should contribute more to your super now to make the most of it later.

Need help?

Super can be complex, but you don’t have to work it all out on your own. If you’d like help understanding these changes or planning your next steps, get in touch with us. We’re here to help.

Age Pension means test changes: What they mean for you

Starting 1 July 2025, Age Pension means test thresholds will increase, potentially boosting eligibility and payments for retirees. These changes, announced by the Department of Social Services, aim to keep pace with inflation and living costs. Here’s a quick overview of how these changes may impact you.

What are the Age Pension means tests?

The Age Pension, available to residents aged 67, uses income and assets tests to determine eligibility and payment amounts. The test that results in the lower pension payment applies. If your income or assets exceed certain thresholds, you may not qualify for a pension or only receive a part pension. From 1 July 2025, these thresholds are rising, meaning more people may qualify for a full or part pension, and current part-pensioners could see higher payments.

Income test changes

The income test assesses earnings from sources like wages, interest, dividends and rental income. Centrelink uses deeming rates (currently 0.25% for the first $62,600 for singles or $103,800 for couples, and 2.25% above these) to estimate income from financial assets like bank accounts, managed funds and shares. The deeming rate from 1 July 2025 had not been confirmed at the time of writing.

From 1 July 2025, the income test thresholds will increase slightly. The new figures are illustrated in the table below.

Table 1: Fortnightly income test thresholds

Situation Maximum Cut-off*
1 July 2025 1 July 2025
Single $218 $2,516
Couple (combined) $380 $3,844

*rounded down to nearest dollar
From 1 July singles can now earn $218 per fortnight ($5,668 yearly) for a full pension, and up to $2,516 ($65,416 yearly) for a part pension.

Each dollar above the lower threshold reduces pension entitlements by 50 cents for singles and by 25 cents for partner for couples.

This does not consider the Work Bonus which lets pensioners earn up to $300 per fortnight from work without affecting their pension.

Assets test changes

The assets test evaluates your assets such as shares, bank accounts, investment properties, etc. However, it excludes your family home. The new thresholds from 1 July 2025 are illustrated in the table below.

Table 2: Asset test thresholds

Situation Homeowner Non-homeowner
Full pension No pension Full pension No pension
Single $321,500 $704,500 $579,500 $962,500
Couple (combined) $481,500 $1,059,000 $739,500 $1,317,000

From 1 July a single homeowner may receive the full age pension if their assets are below $321,500 and a part-pension if their assets are below $704,500. A couple who are homeowners may have up to $481,500 in assets (combined) to receive the full age pension and may receive a part-pension if their assets are below $1,059,000. Non-homeowners can have more assets before their pension is reduced.

What this means for you

The changes to the Age Pension means test thresholds could significantly impact your retirement income, depending on your financial situation. The increased income and asset thresholds mean more retirees may qualify for the Age Pension or receive a higher part pension.

Remember that your Age Pension entitlement is determined by the lower of the income and asset test. If either test results in zero, you’re ineligible.

If you would like to learn more about your Age Pension entitlements give us a call

Changes to deductibility of interest on ATO debts 

An important reminder: Interest incurred in income years starting on or after 1 July will no longer be deductible, regardless of whether the debt relates to an earlier income year.

However, interest charged by the ATO that was incurred before 1 July 2025 can still be claimed as a deduction this tax time.

Therefore, if you have overdue tax debts please arrange an appointment with us so we can discuss what options you have to pay these debts in the most expedient manner.

This could include various payment plans arranged with the ATO. And while general interest charge (GIC) will still accrue, paying off the debt will decrease the amount of interest charged.

Therefore, it is more important than ever for you to keep on top of ATO obligations to avoid unnecessary costs.

This can also include trying to make it easier to have funds available when it’s next time to pay. For example, we can discuss considering setting aside GST, pay as you go withholding and super from your business’s cash flow

Selling shares? Beware of all the CGT rules!

With Trump’s tariffs causing big sell downs on share markets around the world, it is important to understand a few key things about how capital gains (and capital losses) from the sale of shares are treated for CGT purposes in Australia.

For a start, it is crucial to know what the cost – or specifically the “cost base” – of the shares are in order to calculate the assessable capital gain (or loss). This cost base will include relevant brokerage fees.

And for shares received under a dividend reinvestment scheme (DRIP), the cost base will be the value of the dividend which has been applied to buy shares in the company.

Importantly, where only some of the shares in a parcel of shares are sold it will be necessary to identify exactly which of those shares have been sold – in circumstances where you may have acquired the shares at different times for different costs.

In this regard, usually some form of “identifier” (ASX or company etc) is attached to the shares.

But where it is not, the ATO allows you to choose which parcel of shares have been sold – provided you keep records of this so that there is no doubling-up or reselling of the same parcel of the same shares again later on down the track.

And of course, this may allow you to choose which shares you sell in a tax-effective manner.

Of course, the CGT discount is available to reduce the amount of your assessable capital by 50% if you have owned the shares for 12 months – or 365 days to be precise. And in an interesting bit of nitpicking, the ATO takes the view that this does not include the day on which you bought the shares and the day on which you sold them!

Another important thing to understand is how exactly you calculate your “net” capital gain for the income year that is to be included in your assessable income.

And the key thing to note here is that any capital losses of the taxpayer from either the immediate year or prior years must first be applied to any capital gain/s of the taxpayer before applying the 50% CGT discount – and this will mean that there is a bigger net capital gain (if any) to be assessed (as opposed to if the discount was applied first).

However, where there is more than one capital gain from a particular source, the taxpayer can choose which capital gain it will apply the capital loss against first. And, usually, the best result in this case is to apply the capital loss to a gain that is not eligible for the CGT discount.

But where there are a number of capital gains and losses to be netted this process can get complicated – and our advice will be invaluable in this case.

Finally, beware of engaging in “wash sales” in the current volatile market – and this broadly occurs where you sell the shares to, say, realise a capital loss and then buy them back soon after in order to obtain some tax advantage. This ATO treats wash sales as tax avoidance.

So, if you are selling shares, see us first so we can help you do so in the most tax-effective method relative to all your circumstances.